The Awkward question game...

Muspelli wrote:If you could completely erase one group from human history, with no one noticing they were ever here and no evidence of them ever existed, who would you retcon out of human history and why? No obvious ones like the Nazis or the Soviets, that's boring.

c1ask0 wrote:

Muspelli wrote:If you could completely erase one group from human history, with no one noticing they were ever here and no evidence of them ever existed, who would you retcon out of human history and why? No obvious ones like the Nazis or the Soviets, that's boring.

That's a fairly twisted question, if you don't mind me saying so. I think you ought to refrain from asking things like that.

Lucas wrote:What is one thing that is socially unacceptable to hate that you hate?

Muspelli wrote:I shall refrain from asking a question, as my awkward question was not up to the exacting standards of this thread's required levels of awkward (which seem to range on a zero-to-two, out of ten, scale).

JSpoons wrote:

Muspelli wrote:I shall refrain from asking a question, as my awkward question was not up to the exacting standards of this thread's required levels of awkward (which seem to range on a zero-to-two, out of ten, scale).

tl;dr: Someone didn't like my question so I'm gonna try to kill the thread.

Replacement question for above shitpost: Have you ever had a cumfart after bottoming?

JSpoons wrote:

Muspelli wrote:I shall refrain from asking a question, as my awkward question was not up to the exacting standards of this thread's required levels of awkward (which seem to range on a zero-to-two, out of ten, scale).

tl;dr: Someone didn't like my question so I'm gonna try to kill the thread.

Replacement question for above shitpost: Have you ever had a cumfart after bottoming?

Quoewlh wrote:In the situation where I am sane. I would say that if I have:
1. literally 0% risk of getting punished for it or the punishment is bare minimum. It be during the act or after the act. It be physical injury, jailtime, severely damaged social status or any other punishment at all that does not origin from myself.
2. severe personal issues with the person in question and the person's actions would continue to harm me personally (directly or indirectly) in the future.
3. justifications from the people I care about and from the people that are related to the individuals actions, it be directly or indirectly.
4. the possibility to discuss this openly after committing the act without breaking #1.
5. have the measures in order to finish the person quickly or without having to kill the person while facing the individual at all. Preferably a trap or something.
6. No one else is capable to commit the act.

I would commit the crime. Which is basically never. The closest situation I could come up with was a new Hitler or something, but even that would have issues with #1, #5 and #6 especially. I wouldn't be able to kill some extremist leader surrounded by guards 24/7.

Thus a plausible scenario would be if I wouldn't be sane, thus if I have:
1. severe personal issues with an individual.
2. severe depression/paranoia/schizophrenia and/or so on.
3. the thought that I wouldn't be punished... or at least think I wouldn't get caught.

I would commit the crime, which means that I have to go bonkers before I can do something like this.

Lucas wrote:No, not like randomly out in public.



rimjobs?

EleniDoSorto66 wrote:What?