Today I learned... (Post interesting facts.)

poolerboy0077 wrote:

Derek wrote:They're called jockstraps.

Personally, I find it incredibly unappealing when I see a picture of a guy in lace panties, usually with a caption like "use me daddy" or "sissy craving cock" or something similarly revolting.

There’s this couple who does amateur porn vids on PornHub, Zilv and Rourke (one’s a hunky jock, the other a twink who looks just like Hunter), and they totally play on this fetish. So hot.

Awe there adorable together.
But yeah those sorority girl type socks are a huge turnoff.

I never knew Howie Mandell did the voice of gizmo in gremlins.

I got the same but I've always thought the Kinsey scale is very outdated and is not a good way to measure someone's sexuality.

I dont think there's any simple test that can figure the complexity of. Someone's sexual orientation. There are far more then 6 categories (if you can break it into categories) and we know a person's preferences can change in there lifetime.

Fun little quiz if you like those things though.

I think the Kinsey Scale is ok as a basic model and that people make sexuality more complicated than it needs to be.

I agree with the Kinsey Scale in presenting sexuality as a spectrum, with exclusively straight at one end and exclusively gay at the other. You don't need to be 50/50 right down the middle to be considered "bisexual", you can favour one gender more than the other. However you also don't have to split hairs. If you feel you are mostly at one end, then you can still overall classify yourself as "straight" or "gay" even if you do occasionally feel different.

I also find any other labels outside of straight, gay or bisexual to be superfluous and unnecessary. Asexual is someone with a consistently low sex drive. If you're attracted to a certain kind of trans or intersex person, you are still attracted to whatever sexual characteristics they're expressing, so it still goes gay/straight (or bi if it's a combination on one person) to me. I find "pansexual" a completely pointless term. I am attracted to transmen, but I'm not attracted to them because I see them as some weird third gender. I'm attracted to them because they've developed the characteristics I like on men, and that is still gay.

Yeauxleaux wrote:I think the Kinsey Scale is ok as a basic model and that people make sexuality more complicated than it needs to be.

I agree with the Kinsey Scale in presenting sexuality as a spectrum, with exclusively straight at one end and exclusively gay at the other. You don't need to be 50/50 right down the middle to be considered "bisexual", you can favour one gender more than the other. However you also don't have to split hairs. If you feel you are mostly at one end, then you can still overall classify yourself as "straight" or "gay" even if you do occasionally feel different.

I also find any other labels outside of straight, gay or bisexual to be superfluous and unnecessary. Asexual is someone with a consistently low sex drive. If you're attracted to a certain kind of trans or intersex person, you are still attracted to whatever sexual characteristics they're expressing, so it still goes gay/straight (or bi if it's a combination on one person) to me. I find "pansexual" a completely pointless term. I am attracted to transmen, but I'm not attracted to them because I see them as some weird third gender. I'm attracted to them because they've developed the characteristics I like on men, and that is still gay.

Sooo you'd be totally fine if you picked up a guy at a bar or whatever and went home to hook up and discovered he had a pussy?

Victor_Laszlo wrote:Sooo you'd be totally fine if you picked up a guy at a bar or whatever and went home to hook up and discovered he had a pussy?

I never said I was exclusively a bottom :p

Then again that never happens in real life, they generally tell you beforehand.

So a cute guy told you beforehand he is trans and has a pussy.

You'd be down with exploring that?

The polite politically correct part of me wants to say yeah. But i know i dont like nor want any vagina ever again.

I totally agree with label's. But mostly because no one should have to explain what their into. It effects nobodies life but there's. There is no need to join a group cause you like something specific. Its your personal business and should stay that way.

Victor_Laszlo wrote:So a cute guy told you beforehand he is trans and has a pussy.

You'd be down with exploring that?

The polite politically correct part of me wants to say yeah. But i know i dont like nor want any vagina ever again.

If I saw a trans guy who was really passing well and I was attracted to him, liked his features, body looking good and we had good chemistry then personally yes, I wouldn't be turned off if he had a vagina.

That's just me though, I don't judge other gay men for feeling differently as long as they're not rude about it. Everyone has their own deal breakers and if a guy having a pussy is an absolute NO for you, you have a right to feel that way.