Article of the Moment

Discuss the news, current events, politics, etc.

Re: Article of the Moment

Unread postby Magic J » 29 June 2020, 17:20

Brenden wrote:
Sullivan wrote:over-policing of black communities creates more crime

You say this as if it's a given. By what mechanism does "over-policing" create more crime? It certainly finds more crime, but how does it create more crime?

My stab at this would be something like:

1)Police pursue more "petty" crimes, such as drug possession, through things like "stop and search" policies.

2)It's pretty well established that police, in the UK and USA, are more likely to stop/search certain demographics of people. In this case, we're focusing on black persons.

3)Therefore, it's more likely for a black person to be apprehended on a drug charge, even if the rates of drug possession are similar with white persons of a similar economic position. Also, poor whites often just get blasted on prescription pain pills, which happen to be legal.

4)Once charged with the crime, it will likely be more difficult to find employment due to discrimination on the basis of criminal record. Even more so if one is sent to prison for the crime (to which judges send black defendants for longer sentences than white defendants, and for similar crimes, too).

5)Prison stays and general economic hardship are thought by many experts to increase rates of crime (or at least the kind of crime where you're liable to face more prison time for, no comment on white collar crime). Voila, you have created the conditions for the proliferation of more crime.
Naebody's bairn
User avatar
Magic J
 
Posts: 1212
+1s received: 896
Joined: 20 December 2012, 23:06
Location: Scotland
Country: United Kingdom (gb)

Re: Article of the Moment

Unread postby Sullivan » 29 June 2020, 17:32

Brenden wrote:You say this as if it's a given. By what mechanism does "over-policing" create more crime? It certainly finds more crime, but how does it create more crime?

I mean, what is the obvious fallout of mass incarceration? It sticks tens of thousands of blacks, often for minor offenses, in a prison system from which they may well leave hardened criminals even if they did not enter as such. And even if they do make it out with a desire to reenter society, they now have a criminal record that can severely inhibit that transition. These seem like great ways, on the level of the individual, that initial officer interventions can create more crime in the future.

Beyond the individual, there is also the strain dealt to both family units and community fabrics that results from routinely and forcibly removing so many of their members. Here the idea would be that state violence depriving children of parents, fostering a general environment of desperation, what have you, all have knock-on effects that can lead to more crime.

And then you can also have a situation like Ferguson, where the police routinely fined African Americans specifically in order to generate municipal revenues, thereby increasing the economic precarity of an already relatively impoverished community, which seems like an easy way to, once again, create more crime.

These aren't difficult feedback loops to put together. Look at The Ferguson Report. Look at The New Jim Crow.

But the same thing — in fact, worse, because a whole group of pigs were cracking jokes — happened to a white man.

I think the fact of the matter is that, to American police, no one's lives but their own matter. Ironic that they use the phrase "all lives matter" when they have such disregard for human life.

If you want to argue that a major issue with U.S. policing is inculcation of an officer mindset that values preservation of oneself and one's corps above actual community protection, I certainly wouldn't disagree with that. But I think it's misguided if—as Harris seems to be doing—you're going to dissociate that alarming problem of police professionalization from centuries of societal racism and claim that the former factor alone is at play while the latter is irrelevant.
User avatar
Sullivan
 
Posts: 678
+1s received: 206
Joined: 25 July 2013, 02:12
Location: Chicago
Country: United States (us)

Re: Article of the Moment

Unread postby Brenden » 29 June 2020, 17:39

That's a pretty long chain and at the end seems to try and absolve people of individual, personal responsibility for their actions. Are you using this as an excuse for the increased violent crime as well? Against members of their own communities.

I did acknowledge the more policing finds more crime, particularly petty, victimless crime, but the buck stops at the individual and their choice to commit a crime, and victimising, violent crime is still quite rampant amongst black communities in the United States even though crime is falling precipitously overall (likely due to removal of sources of lead contamination since the mid 20th century).

Sullivan wrote:It sticks tens of thousands of blacks, often for minor offenses, in a prison system from which they may well leave hardened criminals even if they did not enter as such.

And is this not largely a cultural issue? Who's turning them into hardened criminals in prison? The prison guards? Are there seminars?
Disclaimer: All views expressed in my posts are my own and do not reflect the views of this forum except when otherwise stated or this signature is not present.

ImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Brenden
Administrator
 
Posts: 8170
+1s received: 2891
Joined: 20 December 2012, 20:12
Location: Maryland, USA / Lanarkshire, Scotland
Country: United Kingdom (gb)

Re: Article of the Moment

Unread postby Brenden » 29 June 2020, 18:04

Anyway, I'm sure all the points you two raise do contribute significantly. I'm not arguing against that.

Is the answer through really to defund the police? Demilitarise, definitely, but defund? Isn't a lack of funding what led the Ferguson police department to prey on the poor for money?

The US has 238 police officers per 100,000. That's significantly fewer than The Netherlands (295), Scotland (318), Belgium (333), France (340), Germany (381), Portugal (445), and Spain (533)! 100th out of 145 countries with data available.
Disclaimer: All views expressed in my posts are my own and do not reflect the views of this forum except when otherwise stated or this signature is not present.

ImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Brenden
Administrator
 
Posts: 8170
+1s received: 2891
Joined: 20 December 2012, 20:12
Location: Maryland, USA / Lanarkshire, Scotland
Country: United Kingdom (gb)

Re: Article of the Moment

Unread postby Magic J » 29 June 2020, 18:05

Brenden wrote:That's a pretty long chain and at the end seems to try and absolve people of individual, personal responsibility for their actions. Are you using this as an excuse for the increased violent crime as well? Against members of their own communities.

I don't think I'm trying to absolve people of personal responsibility. I'm looking at the issue on a higher level than that. The point I'm trying to make is that the call for "personal responsibility" seems to fall hardest on black persons, in this case.

And on violent crime? Yeah, I'd think that relative levels of poverty are in play here. Take Glasgow, which has historically had some of the most impoverished communities in Britain, and also the most instances of violent crime ("murder capital of Europe"). Are we to suggest that the predominantly white, working class communities which are most exposed to violent crime are just "culturally violent"? Or is it more likely that poverty creates the conditions for violence to flourish? I mean, there could be elements of "culture" in this, but even if we concede this, it seems likely to me that any supposed ingrained "predilection for violence" has its root cause in economic precarity.

Brenden wrote:And is this not largely a cultural issue? Who's turning them into hardened criminals in prison? The prison guards? Are there seminars?

Well, I'd suppose that there's a certain level of institutionalisation occurring in those sent to prison, particularly if it's a violent environment. I imagine it has deleterious effects on a persons personality which might make it more or less difficult to deal with others upon their release.
Naebody's bairn
User avatar
Magic J
 
Posts: 1212
+1s received: 896
Joined: 20 December 2012, 23:06
Location: Scotland
Country: United Kingdom (gb)

Re: Article of the Moment

Unread postby Brenden » 29 June 2020, 18:09

But guess how Glasgow has gone from being the murder capital of Europe to one of the safer UK cities (especially compared to London)! MORE POLICE. When Police Scotland reorganised, they got rid of a lot of middle management positions and used the money to significantly increase the number of on-the-beat officers. Scotland has ⅓ more police per capita than the United States now, the second highest in the UK (after Northern Ireland).
Disclaimer: All views expressed in my posts are my own and do not reflect the views of this forum except when otherwise stated or this signature is not present.

ImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Brenden
Administrator
 
Posts: 8170
+1s received: 2891
Joined: 20 December 2012, 20:12
Location: Maryland, USA / Lanarkshire, Scotland
Country: United Kingdom (gb)

Re: Article of the Moment

Unread postby Magic J » 29 June 2020, 18:37

Brenden wrote:Is the answer through really to defund the police? Demilitarise, definitely, but defund?

Brenden wrote:But guess how Glasgow has gone from being the murder capital of Europe to one of the safer UK cities (especially compared to London)! MORE POLICE. When Police Scotland reorganised, they got rid of a lot of middle management positions and used the money to significantly increase the number of on-the-beat officers. Scotland has ⅓ more police per capita than the United States now, the second highest in the UK (after Northern Ireland).


Ah! I seem to have missed one of your posts. :lol:

On the issue of defund/abolish/reform etc., I have no real idea. Soz. :P As an outside observer, I think I lean towards disarmament, systemic reform and democratisation, which probably would require more funding (though not just for police departments, but also for other social services). I suppose that I made a pretty uncritical comparison by raising the Glasgow example: since the contexts are so different. The community policing focus in Glasgow and Northern Ireland has indeed been very successful. Whether that could translate into a US context is, obviously, hugely debatable.
Naebody's bairn
User avatar
Magic J
 
Posts: 1212
+1s received: 896
Joined: 20 December 2012, 23:06
Location: Scotland
Country: United Kingdom (gb)

Re: Article of the Moment

Unread postby poolerboy0077 » 12 July 2020, 21:48

Blow: "Nowadays even Liam can release an album of his screechy vocals and it'll probably go #1..."
Ramzus: I can admit that I'm horny just about 24/7
homomorphism: I used to not think your name was deshay and that Erick was just being racist
Hunter: sometimes I think I was literally born to be a pornstar
User avatar
poolerboy0077
 
Posts: 9099
+1s received: 2381
Joined: 20 December 2012, 21:20
Country: United States (us)

Re: Article of the Moment

Unread postby Sullivan » 13 July 2020, 12:02

Farhad Manjoo wrote:There have been several proposals to ban cars in Manhattan, and the city has been working on a system to impose a toll on cars south of 60th Street. (This congestion-pricing project was scheduled to start early next year, but it has been delayed by the pandemic.)


I think it's ironic that in an op-ed prompted by the pandemic about a post-car future the only new anti-car policy New York is actually trying to implement that gets referenced is on hold because of the pandemic.
User avatar
Sullivan
 
Posts: 678
+1s received: 206
Joined: 25 July 2013, 02:12
Location: Chicago
Country: United States (us)

Re: Article of the Moment

Unread postby Sullivan » 25 July 2020, 04:40

Clash of the Historians

Americanists fascinate me.
User avatar
Sullivan
 
Posts: 678
+1s received: 206
Joined: 25 July 2013, 02:12
Location: Chicago
Country: United States (us)

Re: Article of the Moment

Unread postby poolerboy0077 » 28 July 2020, 07:01

Blow: "Nowadays even Liam can release an album of his screechy vocals and it'll probably go #1..."
Ramzus: I can admit that I'm horny just about 24/7
homomorphism: I used to not think your name was deshay and that Erick was just being racist
Hunter: sometimes I think I was literally born to be a pornstar
User avatar
poolerboy0077
 
Posts: 9099
+1s received: 2381
Joined: 20 December 2012, 21:20
Country: United States (us)

Re: Article of the Moment

Unread postby Brenden » 28 July 2020, 20:13

Disclaimer: All views expressed in my posts are my own and do not reflect the views of this forum except when otherwise stated or this signature is not present.

ImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Brenden
Administrator
 
Posts: 8170
+1s received: 2891
Joined: 20 December 2012, 20:12
Location: Maryland, USA / Lanarkshire, Scotland
Country: United Kingdom (gb)

Re: Article of the Moment

Unread postby Magic J » 10 August 2020, 21:56

Was talking to one of my colleagues today. Surveying the situation in the US, we sagely concluded that what the USA really needs right now is its first Juggalo president. Well, whadyaknow...

Insane Clown Posse: Models of Pandemic-Era Leadership

:lol:
Naebody's bairn
User avatar
Magic J
 
Posts: 1212
+1s received: 896
Joined: 20 December 2012, 23:06
Location: Scotland
Country: United Kingdom (gb)

Re: Article of the Moment

Unread postby Brenden » 12 August 2020, 20:51

In a correction, the American Journal of Psychology wrote:After the article “Reduction in Mental Health Treatment Utilization Among Transgender Individuals After Gender-Affirming Surgeries: A Total Population Study” by Richard Bränström, Ph.D., and John E. Pachankis, Ph.D. (doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19010080), was published online on October 4, 2019, some letters containing questions on the statistical methodology employed in the study led the Journal to seek statistical consultations. The results of these consultations were presented to the study authors, who concurred with many of the points raised. Upon request, the authors reanalyzed the data to compare outcomes between individuals diagnosed with gender incongruence who had received gender-affirming surgical treatments and those diagnosed with gender incongruence who had not. While this comparison was performed retrospectively and was not part of the original research question given that several other factors may differ between the groups, the results demonstrated no advantage of surgery in relation to subsequent mood or anxiety disorder-related health care visits or prescriptions or hospitalizations following suicide attempts in that comparison. Given that the study used neither a prospective cohort design nor a randomized controlled trial design, the conclusion that “the longitudinal association between gender-affirming surgery and lower use of mental health treatment lends support to the decision to provide gender-affirming surgeries to transgender individuals who seek them” is too strong. Finally, although the percentage of individuals with a gender incongruence diagnosis who had received gender-affirming surgical treatments during the follow-up period is correctly reported in Table 3 (37.9%), the text incorrectly refers to this percentage as 48%. The article was reposted on August 1, 2020, correcting this percentage and including an addendum referencing the postpublication discussion captured in the Letters to the Editor section of the August 2020 issue of the Journal (1).
[Emphasis mine.]
Disclaimer: All views expressed in my posts are my own and do not reflect the views of this forum except when otherwise stated or this signature is not present.

ImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Brenden
Administrator
 
Posts: 8170
+1s received: 2891
Joined: 20 December 2012, 20:12
Location: Maryland, USA / Lanarkshire, Scotland
Country: United Kingdom (gb)

Re: Article of the Moment

Unread postby Brenden » 17 September 2020, 17:53

It’s time to derail the Pride train
The rainbow flag for Pride has been through a similarly bewildering metamorphosis. It was designed in the late 1970s to supersede the pink triangle, which had been appropriated from Nazi concentration camps as a gesture of empowerment and defiance. The new rainbow symbol was a conscious attempt to distance itself from such dark connotations and express a more joyful and optimistic outlook.

Originally featuring eight stripes, it was soon whittled down to a more striking six-stripe version, which was the standard for many decades. With the ungovernable escalation of identity politics and intersectionality over the past few years, various interest groups have competed for ‘representation’ on the flag. The ‘progress flag’, for instance, adds a five-stripe chevron: the pink, light blue and white stripes signify trans rights, while the black and brown stripes represent people of colour – as though the original rainbow was some kind of literal depiction of the skin colours that are acceptable in the gay community.



The struggle for gay rights was about equal treatment before the law, and making visible those whose persecution by the state had driven them into the shadows of society. Now that equality has been achieved, Pride has descended into a corporate orgy of identitarianism. The rainbow flag and all its tawdry spinoffs are a marker of virtue for companies that wish to sell products to the gullible and declare their commitment to ‘diversity and inclusion’. Last year I had the misfortune of dining at a restaurant in Soho awash with rainbow flags, with signs that openly stated that the company supported equal rights for LGBT people. Why would they suppose anyone would assume otherwise? If anything, a business that feels the need to shout about how it doesn’t discriminate against gay people makes me suspect that it might be secretly homophobic.
Disclaimer: All views expressed in my posts are my own and do not reflect the views of this forum except when otherwise stated or this signature is not present.

ImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Brenden
Administrator
 
Posts: 8170
+1s received: 2891
Joined: 20 December 2012, 20:12
Location: Maryland, USA / Lanarkshire, Scotland
Country: United Kingdom (gb)

Re: Article of the Moment

Unread postby PopTart » 17 September 2020, 18:42

Brenden wrote:It’s time to derail the Pride train
The rainbow flag for Pride has been through a similarly bewildering metamorphosis. It was designed in the late 1970s to supersede the pink triangle, which had been appropriated from Nazi concentration camps as a gesture of empowerment and defiance. The new rainbow symbol was a conscious attempt to distance itself from such dark connotations and express a more joyful and optimistic outlook.

Originally featuring eight stripes, it was soon whittled down to a more striking six-stripe version, which was the standard for many decades. With the ungovernable escalation of identity politics and intersectionality over the past few years, various interest groups have competed for ‘representation’ on the flag. The ‘progress flag’, for instance, adds a five-stripe chevron: the pink, light blue and white stripes signify trans rights, while the black and brown stripes represent people of colour – as though the original rainbow was some kind of literal depiction of the skin colours that are acceptable in the gay community.



The struggle for gay rights was about equal treatment before the law, and making visible those whose persecution by the state had driven them into the shadows of society. Now that equality has been achieved, Pride has descended into a corporate orgy of identitarianism. The rainbow flag and all its tawdry spinoffs are a marker of virtue for companies that wish to sell products to the gullible and declare their commitment to ‘diversity and inclusion’. Last year I had the misfortune of dining at a restaurant in Soho awash with rainbow flags, with signs that openly stated that the company supported equal rights for LGBT people. Why would they suppose anyone would assume otherwise? If anything, a business that feels the need to shout about how it doesn’t discriminate against gay people makes me suspect that it might be secretly homophobic.

I don't know if anyone else has noticed, how the London pride parade, that was once a march by the many varied eclectic groups of the wider gay community, has been replaced by a procession of vans and open topped buses, sponsored by a litany of high street retailers and employers names and logos. Gone are the colourful community designed floats, the extravagant drag Queens, the people marching together in unity, now the community stands behind roadside barricades and watches the barely adorned trucks make their way around the parade route, with a handful of celebs aboard, along side some gay staff from the company in question. It's not just commercial, it's not really about pride.

I miss the real parade march from previous years.
ImageImage
User avatar
PopTart
 
Posts: 3017
+1s received: 2459
Joined: 12 December 2017, 11:15
Country: United States (us)

Re: Article of the Moment

Unread postby Magic J » 17 September 2020, 19:56

I've never actually been to a Pride parade in the UK, so can't say I've really noticed the apparent change in character. I'm told it's somewhat commercialised these days, though, like you say. It just ain't punk, man.

Can't read the article, though. Not disabling my blocker for fucking Spiked. They got enough Koch dolla. :lol:
Naebody's bairn
User avatar
Magic J
 
Posts: 1212
+1s received: 896
Joined: 20 December 2012, 23:06
Location: Scotland
Country: United Kingdom (gb)

Re: Article of the Moment

Unread postby PopTart » 17 September 2020, 20:02

Magic J wrote:I've never actually been to a Pride parade in the UK, so can't say I've really noticed the apparent change in character. I'm told it's somewhat commercialised these days, though, like you say. It just ain't punk, man.

Can't read the article, though. Not disabling my blocker for fucking Spiked. They got enough Koch dolla. :lol:

I too refused to disable my blocker :lol:

The subject just brought pride parade to mind. Brighton isn't as bad, but then, the Brighton scene was super toxic last time i was there :cry:
ImageImage
User avatar
PopTart
 
Posts: 3017
+1s received: 2459
Joined: 12 December 2017, 11:15
Country: United States (us)

Re: Article of the Moment

Unread postby Brenden » 17 September 2020, 20:23

Huh. I didn't have to disable my ad blocker.
Disclaimer: All views expressed in my posts are my own and do not reflect the views of this forum except when otherwise stated or this signature is not present.

ImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Brenden
Administrator
 
Posts: 8170
+1s received: 2891
Joined: 20 December 2012, 20:12
Location: Maryland, USA / Lanarkshire, Scotland
Country: United Kingdom (gb)

Re: Article of the Moment

Unread postby Magic J » 17 September 2020, 22:56

PopTart wrote:Brighton isn't as bad, but then, the Brighton scene was super toxic last time i was there :cry:

I've only been to Brighton once, when I was like, seven. The only thing I can really remember is that I won a cuddly shark toy at some arcade game, and somebody stole it. Oh, also, I remember a drunk guy being physically thrown out the door of a Woolworths by a security guard. I'm sure it's lovely, but that's my abiding impression of Brighton. :lol:

Why toxic?
Naebody's bairn
User avatar
Magic J
 
Posts: 1212
+1s received: 896
Joined: 20 December 2012, 23:06
Location: Scotland
Country: United Kingdom (gb)

PreviousNext

Recently active
Users browsing this forum: CommonCrawl [Bot] and 33 guests